Star Hype News.

Premium celebrity moments with standout appeal.

news

Different use of approximate equality symbols

By Sebastian Wright
$\begingroup$

I have been wondering for a long time whether there is a unequivocal way to define and use the symbols commonly adopted for an approximate equality between two quantities. I am a physicist, and I often see them used interchangeably and more or less only accordingly to the taste of the author or lecturer.

But what is a reasonable and clear way to differentiate between these symbols?

I refer to:

$$\approx\ \simeq\ \sim\ $$

$\endgroup$ 4

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

The symbol $\sim$ is usually used for asymptotic equivalence for functions.

One says that $f\sim_a g$ if $$\lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} =1.$$ If no $a$ is precised (which is the most usual case), the limit is taken at infinity.

On the other side, $\approx$ and $\simeq$ are used for decimal approximation for numbers. Example $$\pi \approx 3,14.$$ We prefer $\approx$ to $\simeq$ since $\simeq$ denotes often an isomorphism (for example between two groups, two rings).

In conclusion, the difference between these symbols is made thanks to the mathematical objects for which there are defined.

  • Functions : $\sim$
  • Numbers : $\approx$
  • Groups, rings (in general : category theory) : $\simeq $

NB : These are the conventions that I often read in the literature, no doubt that can be others.

$\endgroup$ 2

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy